Which doctrine is NOT associated with the UN Human Rights Committee?

The doctrine of progressive realization is not associated with the UN Human Rights Committee. This concept is primarily linked to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and relates to the obligations of states to gradually fulfill economic, social, and cultural rights to the maximum of their available resources. It emphasizes that the enjoyment of these rights may not be fully realized immediately but should be pursued over time.

In contrast, the other doctrines listed are specifically recognized and utilized by the UN Human Rights Committee, which monitors compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The principle of "no margin of appreciation," for instance, pertains to the Committee's approach to evaluating state actions against their obligations under human rights law, indicating a lack of flexibility in justifying human rights violations based on national discretion. Effective remedies under Article 2(3) assert that states must provide accessible and effective remedies for victims of human rights violations. Strict treaty interpretation relates to how the Committee interprets the text of treaties to ensure that their meaning reflects the fundamental principles of human rights.

Thus, the presence of progressive realization as a key concept within the economic, social, and cultural context distinguishes it from the civil and political rights framework monitored by the UN Human