What is the primary reason for weak enforcement among the discussed entities?

The primary reason for weak enforcement among international human rights entities lies in their dependence on state cooperation. International human rights laws and treaties are often only as effective as the willingness of states to adhere to and enforce them. States have the sovereign authority to implement these laws, and without their commitment or cooperation, enforcement mechanisms can become ineffective. This reliance on states may lead to situations where human rights violations occur without any accountability, as there may be little recourse for enforcement bodies to act unless the states themselves choose to comply.

The other factors listed do not drive the issue of weak enforcement in the same way. Strong judicial authority could theoretically enhance enforcement capabilities, while the presence of a police force is more relevant to domestic law enforcement rather than international contexts. Binding resolutions, while impactful, often depend on states' willingness to follow through; thus they are not a standalone solution to the enforcement problem. Therefore, the dependence on state cooperation is crucial in understanding the challenges faced in enforcing international human rights laws effectively.